Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy

ßäåðíà ô³çèêà òà åíåðãåòèêà
Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy

  ISSN: 1818-331X (Print), 2074-0565 (Online)
  Publisher: Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
  Languages: Ukrainian, English, Russian
  Periodicity: 4 times per year

  Open access peer reviewed journal


 Home page   About 
Nucl. Phys. At. Energy 2020, volume 21, issue 1, pages 49-57.
Section: Atomic Energy.
Received: 11.07.2019; Accepted: 19.03.2020; Published online: 14.05.2020.
PDF Full text (en)
https://doi.org/10.15407/jnpae2020.01.049

Verification of 235U mass content in some nuclear fuel fabrication for CANDU reactors by an absolute method

Ahmed G. Mostafa1, Sayed A. Makhlouf2, Elham El-Hakim3, Morsy S. El-Tahawy4, Abdel Fatah A. Hamed4, Atef El-Taher2,*

1 Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
2 Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Assiut, Egypt
3 Nuclear Fuel Research Laboratory, Nuclear Research Center, Atomic Energy Authority, Inshas, Egypt
4Nuclear Safeguards and Physical Protection Department, Egyptian Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Authority, Cairo, Egypt


*Corresponding author. E-mail address: atef.eltaher@gmail.com

Abstract: In this paper, the physical inventory taking of nuclear materials (NM) (under safeguards application) at the nuclear fuel research laboratory at Inshas, Egypt has been considered. NM with different forms and sizes were verified. The verification method based on non-destructive measurements of gamma radiation emitted from NM was tested. Monte Carlo method (MCNP5) and Multi-Group Analysis software (MGAU Genie 2000, version 3.2) were used to estimate 235U mass content in the studied forms. Some of the parameters which affect NM mass estimation were also investigated. The proposed procedure covers different forms found at the nuclear fuel research laboratory such as pellets, sludge, and rods. The average accuracies for the estimated 235U masses ranged between -0.351 and -1.005 %, while the precision was about 2.065 and 7.45 % for MCNP5 and MGAU respectively. These results are found to be acceptable within the limits of the International Target Values.

Keywords: fuel fabrication, physical inventory taking, Monte Carlo method.

References:

1. The Evolution of IAEA Safeguards. International Nuclear Verification Series No. 2 (Austria, Vienna, IAEA, 1998). Document

2. Guidelines for states’ systems of accounting for and control of nuclear materials. IAEA/SG/INF/2 (Austria, Vienna, IAEA, 1980). Document

3. H. Aigner et al. International Target Values 2000 for Measurement Uncertainties in Safeguarding Nuclear Materials. Safeguards Technical Report STR-327. (Vienna, IAEA, 2001).

4. I.O.B. Ewa et al. Monte Carlo determination of full energy peak efficiency for a HPGe detector. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 55(1) (2001) 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(00)00366-3

5. M. Garcia-Talavera et al. Towards a proper modeling of detector and source characteristic in Monte Carlo simulations. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 52 (2000) 777. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8043(99)00244-4

6. A.A. Hamed et al. On the absolute measurement of some nuclear material samples. Journal of Nuclear and Radiation Physics 5(1&2) (2010) 25. Paper

7. J. Saegusa et al. Determination of detection efficiency curves of HPGe detectors on radioactivity measurement of volume samples. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 61 (2004) 1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.04.004

8. J.L. Parker, M. Brooks. Accurate, Wide-Range Uranium Enrichment Measurements by Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy. Report LA-11277-MS, UC-15 (Los Alamos National Lab., 1988). https://www.lanl.gov/orgs/n/n1/docs/la_11277.pdf

9. R. Gunnink et al. MGAU: A New Analysis Code for Measuring Uranium-235 Enrichment in Arbitrary Samples. Proc. Symp. Intern. Nuclear Safeguards. IAEA-SM-333 (Vienna, 1994). https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/25/040/25040083.pdf

10. T. Dragnev et al. Combined Gamma and Passive X-Ray Fluorescent Measurement of 235U Enrichment and U-total Concentration. J. Radioanalytical Nucl. Chem. 152(1) (1991) 161. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02042150

11. T. Dragnev et al. Quantitative Gamma Ray and X-Ray Measurements of Nuclear Materials. Proc. Symp. Intern. Nuclear Safeguards. IAEA-SM-333 (Vienna, 1994) p. 171.

12. I. Badawy et al. Measurement of Uranium Fuel Elements without use of Nuclear Material Standards. ESARDA 19-th Ann. Symp. on Safeguards and Nuclear Material Management (France, Montpellier, 1997) p. 525.

13. E.R. Martin, D.F. Jones, J.L. Parker. Gamma-Ray Measurements with the Segmented Gamma Scanner. Report LA-7059-M (Los Alamos Scientific Lab., 1977). https://doi.org/10.2172/5169544

14. Standard Test Method for Nondestructive Assay of Special Nuclear Material in Low-Density Scrap and Waste by Segmented Passive Gamma-Ray Scanning. ASTM C1133-89 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1989).

15. K.M. Wainio, G.F. Knoll. Calculated gamma ray response characteristics of semiconductor detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 44(2) (1966) 213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(66)90153-4

16. N.V. de Castro Faria, R.J.A. Levesque. Photopeak and double-escape peak efficiencies of germanium lithium drift detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 46(2) (1967) 325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(67)90091-2

17. C. Meixner. A Monte Carlo program for the calculation of gamma-ray spectra for germanium detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 119 (1974) 521. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(74)90802-7

18. B.J. Varley et al. Investigations of the response of germanium detectors to monoenergetic electron, positron and gamma ray beams. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 190(3) (1981) 543. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(81)90955-1

19. S. Hurtado, M. García-León, R. García-Tenorio. Monte Carlo simulation of the response of a germanium detector for low-level spectrometry measurements using GEANT4. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 61(2-3) (2004) 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.03.035

20. C.M. Salgado, C.C. Conti, P.H.B. Becker. Determination of HPGe detector response using MCNP5 for 20 - 150 keV X-rays. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 64(6) (2006) 700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.12.011

21. G. Fehrenbacher, R. Meckbach, P. Jacob. Unfolding the response of a Ge detector used for in-situ gamma-ray spectrometry. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 383 (1996) 454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(96)00824-8

22. M.A. Ludington, R.G. Helmer. High accuracy measurements and Monte Carlo calculations of the relative efficiency curve of an HPGe detector from 433 to 2754 keV. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 446(3) (2000) 506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(99)01253-X

23. T.F. Wang et al. Monte Carlo simulation of plutonium gamma-ray standards. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 353(1-3) (1994) 678. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(94)91749-3

24. International Target Values for Measurement Uncertainties in Safeguarding Nuclear Materials. Report to General Assembly with Scientific Annexes (New York, UNSCEAR, 2000).