 |
ßäåðíà ô³çèêà òà åíåðãåòèêà
ISSN:
1818-331X (Print), 2074-0565 (Online) |
| Home page | About |
Full text (en) Monte Carlo-based analysis of the photon beam fluence with air gap thickness between Linac head exit window and patient’s skin in radiotherapy treatments
Mohamed Bencheikh1,*, Abdelmajid Maghnouj2, Jaouad Tajmouati2
1 Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences and Technologies Mohammedia, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Mohammedia, Morocco
2 LISTA Laboratory, Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences Dhar El-Mahraz, University of Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Fez, Morocco
*Corresponding author. E-mail address:
bc.mohamed@gmail.com
Abstract: Linear accelerators (Linac) are used in radiation therapy treatment and its technology improvement ensures high dosimetry quality that should be conserved for high radiotherapy efficiency. However, does the air gap between the exit window of Linac head and patient’s skin alters the physical properties of the photon beam? The objective of this study is to assess the physical properties changes of photon beam fluence according to air gap thickness under the Linac head. The air gap under the Linac head is the last material in the photon beam path; it induces alterations in the beam quality before reaching the patient’s skin. The Varian Clinac 2100 head and the air gap up to the phantom surface are modelled using Monte Carlo BEAMnrc code; the nominal beam energy is 6 MV. The BEAMDP code is used to extract the photon fluence. The photon beam fluence is affected by the air gap under Linac head and decreases by six times due to the photon beam attenuation with air gap thickness; in addition to increasing of beam contamination by scattered photons and electrons. Thus, the air gap induces the beam quality deterioration which is evaluated in terms of photon fluence with air gap thickness. To remove the particles contaminations and conserve integrally the photon beam quality, the number of the photon interactions with air atoms should be as low as possible under Linac head up to patient’s skin and ensure a higher quality of the radiotherapy treatment of deep tumour.
Keywords: air gap, Linac head, Monte Carlo simulation, photon beam quality, BEAMnrc code.
References:1. M. Bencheikh, A. Maghnouj, J. Tajmouati. Energetic Properties’ Investigation of Removing Flattening Filter at Phantom Surface: Monte Carlo Study using BEAMnrc Code, DOSXYZnrc Code and BEAMDP Code. PEPAN Letters 14(6) (2017) 921. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477117060073
2. M. Bencheikh et al. Electron contamination fluence evaluation of flattening filter free (FFF) configuration of Linac head. Annals of University of Craiova Physics 28 (2018) 40. http://cis01.central.ucv.ro/pauc/vol/2018_28/6_2018.pdf
3. M. Bencheikh et al. Photon beam quality study with thickness of air gap under Linac head based on maximum fluence rate investigation at the beam edge. Annals of University of Craiova Physics 28 (2018) 31. http://cis01.central.ucv.ro/pauc/vol/2018_28/5_2018.pdf
4. Eeva Boman et al. Monte Carlo investigation on the effect of air gap under bolus in post-mastectomy radiotherapy. Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics 55 (2018) 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.10.023
5. M. Molazadeh et al. Dosimetric characteristics of LinaTech DMLC H multi leaf collimator: Monte Carlo simulation and experimental study. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 18(2) (2017) 113. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12055
6. F. Verhaegen, J. Seuntjens. Monte Carlo modelling of external radiotherapy photon beams. Phys. Med. Biol. 48 (2003) 107. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/48/21/R01
7. M. Bencheikh, A. Maghnouj, J. Tajmouati. Study of photon beam dosimetry quality for removing flattening filter Linac configuration. Annals of University of Craiova Physics 27 (2017) 50. http://cis01.central.ucv.ro/pauc/vol/2017_27/7_2017.pdf
8. A. Didi et al. Monte Carlo simulation of thermal neutron flux of americium-beryllium source used in neutron activation analysis. Moscow University Physics Bulletin 72(5) (2017) 460. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134917050022
9. P. Gonias et al. Monte Carlo simulation of a 6 MV varian LINAC photon beam using GEANT4-GATE code. Physica Medica: European Journal of Medical Physics 32(3) (2016) 333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.07.245
10. J.P. Seuntjens et al. Absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams. Medical Physics 27 (2000) 2763. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1328081
11. T.U. Uddin. Quality control of modern linear accelerator: dose stability long and short-term. Proc. of IPAC (New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2012) p. 2660. http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/IPAC2012/html/auth3718.htm
12. K. Smith et al. AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 8.a.: Linear accelerator performance tests. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 18(4) (2017) 23. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12080
13. M. Bencheikh, A. Maghnouj, J. Tajmouati. Dosimetry Investigation and Evaluation for Removing Flattening Filter Configuration of Linac: Monte Carlo Study. Moscow University Physics Bulletin 72(6) (2017) 640. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0027134918660025
14. M. Bencheikh et al. Analysis of stabilization of photon beam softening with off-axis distance for filtration system enhancement to increase dosimetry in radiotherapy. Journal of King Saud University - Sciences 32(1) (2020) 595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2018.09.006
15. D.W.O. Rogers, B. Walters, I. Kawrakow. BEAMnrc User’s Manual. NRCC Report PIRS-0509 (Ottawa, 2013). NRCC Report
16. D.A. Low et al. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Medical Physics 25 (1998) 656. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598248
17. D.A. Low, J.F. Dempsey. Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method. Medical Physics 30(9) (2003) 2455. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1598711
18. M. Bencheikh, A. Maghnouj, J. Tajmouati. Percentage depth dose fragmentation for investigating and assessing the photon beam dosimetry quality. Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice 18(3) (2019) 280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1460396918000687
19. Technical Reports Series No. 430. Commissioning and Quality Assurance of Computerized Planning Systems for Radiation Treatment of Cancer (Vienna: IAEA, 2004). IAEA Report 430
20. IAEA-TECDOC-1540. Specification and Acceptance Testing of Radiotherapy Treatment Planning Systems (Vienna: IAEA, 2007). https://www.iaea.org/publications/7676/specification-and-acceptance-testing-of-radiotherapy-treatment-planning-systems
21. M. Bencheikh et al. Validation of Monte Carlo simulation of linear accelerator using BEAMnrc code and DOSXYZnrc code. PEPAN Letters 14(5) (2017) 780. https://doi.org/10.1134/S154747711705003X
22. B. Kadman et al. Consistency check of photon beam physical data after recommissioning process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 694 (2016) 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/694/1/012023
23. C.M. Ma, D.W.O. Rogers. BEAMDP User’s Manual. National Research Council of Canada. NRCC Report (Ottawa, 2013). https://github.com/nrc-cnrc/EGSnrc/raw/gh-pages/doc/pirs509c-beamdp.pdf
24. A. Gray, L.D. Oliver, P.N. Johnston. The accuracy of the pencil beam convolution and anisotropic analytical algorithms in predicting the dose effects due to attenuation from immobilization devices and large air gaps. Medical Physics 36(7) (2009) 3181. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3147204
25. J.B. Martin et al. Effects on skin dose from unwanted air gaps under bolus in photon beam radiotherapy. Radiation Measurements 32(3) (2000) 201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00276-0