Ядерна фізика та енергетика Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy   ISSN: 1818-331X (Print), 2074-0565 (Online)   Publisher: Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine   Languages: Ukrainian, English   Periodicity: 4 times per year   Open access peer reviewed journal

Full text (ua)

V. I. Borysenko^*, V. V. Goranchuk

Institute for Safety Problems of Nuclear Power Plants, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

^*Corresponding author. E-mail address: vborysenko@ispnpp.kiev.ua

Abstract: The reactor model was used to study the accident that destroyed the RBMK-1000 reactor at Unit 4 of the Chornobyl nuclear power plant on 26 April 1996. The model of reactivity accident of the RBMK-1000 reactor is based on equations of nuclear reactor kinetics, taking into account feedback in reactor reactivity. Reactivity changes as a result of both external influences – the movement of regulatory organs, changes in the reactor inlet coolant temperature, – and as a result of feedback by core parameters – changes in fuel temperature, coolant density, and ¹³⁵Хе concentration. The model takes into account steam generation in the reactor core, which corresponds to the real physics of processes at the RBMK reactor, and allows obtaining simulation results that best match the recorded data and the consequences of the accident process. The study of reactivity accident on RBMK-1000 reactor is carried out for different combinations of values of control rods efficiency; reactivity coefficients by fuel temperature and coolant density; changes in the reactor inlet coolant temperature; the emergency protection time, as well as the reactor power level before closing the turbine generator stop valve. Different reactivity accident scenarios at RBMK-1000 reactor allow us to determine the most unfavorable combinations of external influences on the course of reactivity accident, namely: start time of main coolant pump rundown, time of activation of emergency protection, power level before the closing of turbine generator stop valves. In most reactivity accident scenarios, first of all, the critical values of fuel enthalpy are reached, at which the process of fuel destruction in the fuel element, destruction of the fuel assembly, and assembly channel start. Important results of studies are 1 – determination of the fact that time of activation of emergency protection after the closing of stop valves of turbine generator significantly affects the value of the maximum neutron power that is achieved during a reactivity accident; 2 – determination of the effect of reactor power before the closing of turbine generator stop valves on the course of the accident; 3 – it is not necessary to achieve supercritical on instantaneous neutrons, supercritical on delayed neutrons is enough to start fuel destruction.

Keywords: uranium-graphite reactor, reactivity, temperature coefficient of reactivity, coolant density coefficient of reactivity, fuel enthalpy, end effect, graphite displacer.

1. Chornobyl Accident: Supplement to INSAG-1. INSAG-7. Report of the International Advisory Group on Nuclear Safety (Vienna, IAEA, 1993) 159 p. (Rus) https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub913r_web.pdf

2. V.I. Borysenko, V.V. Goranchuk. Model of Reactivity Accident of the RBMK-1000 of the Chornobyl NPP 4th Power Unit. Yaderna Enerhetyka ta Dovkillia (Nuclear Power and the Environment) 2(21) (2021) 39 (Ukr) http://npe.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/21-4.pdf

3. V.I. Borysenko. On the nuclear safety of uranium-graphite reactors. Problemy Bezpeky Atomnykh Elektrostantsii i Chornobylia (Problems of Nuclear Power Plants Safety and of Chornobyl) 26 (2016) 15. (Rus) http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/127762/02-Borysenko.pdf?sequence=1

4. J.R. Kipin. Physical Fundamentals of Nuclear Reactor Kinetics. Rus. transl. (Moskva: Atomizdat, 1967) 428 p. (Rus)

5. I.A. Kuznetsov. Emergency and Transient Processes in Fast Reactors (Мoskva: Energoatomizdat, 1967) 171 p. (Rus)

6. V.I. Borysenko, V.V. Goranchuk. Determination of conservative parameters of model of reactor for research of transient of VVER-1000. Problemy Bezpeky Atomnykh Elektrostantsii i Chornobylia (Problems of Nuclear Power Plants Safety and of Chornobyl 20 (2013) 28. (Rus) http://www.ispnpp.kiev.ua/wp-content/uploads/2017/2013_20/c28.pdf

7. N.V. Karpan. Chornobyl. Revenge of the Peaceful Atom (Moskva, 2006) 566 p. (Rus)

8. V.A. Halimonchuk, A.V. Kuchin. Simulation of the Chornobyl accident. Yaderna ta Radiatsiina Bezpeka (Nuclear and Radiation Safety) 3(51) (2011) 20. (Rus) https://doi.org/10.32918/nrs.2011.3(51).04

9. M.A. Abramov et al. Channel-Type Nuclear Power Reactor RBMK. Yu.M. Cherkashov (Ed.) (Moskva: State Unitary Enterprise Research and Design Institute of Power Engineering, 2006) 632 p. (Rus)

10. A.N. Rumyantsev. Chornobyl in 2009. (Rus) http://www.proatom.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=article&thold=1&mode=flat&order=1&sid=2842

11. Information on the Chornobyl accident and its consequences prepared for the IAEA. INSAG-1. Atomnaya Energiya 61(5) (1986) 301. (Rus)

12. V.M. Dmitriev. The causes of the Chornobyl accident are known. (Rus) http://www.accidont.ru

13. Analysis of NPP System Operation in the Turbine Generator Rundown Mode at Unit 4 of ChNPP (26.04.86) According to Parameter Registration Data and Design Documentation. Report of the Research and Design Institute of Power Engineering, 1995. (Rus)

14. Technological regulations for the operation of Units 3 and 4 of Chornobyl NPP with RBMK-1000 reactors. 1E-C–II. Came into force by Order No. 953 dated 12.15.1983 (Chornobyl, ChNPP, 1983) 98 p. (Rus)