Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy

ßäåðíà ô³çèêà òà åíåðãåòèêà
Nuclear Physics and Atomic Energy

  ISSN: 1818-331X (Print), 2074-0565 (Online)
  Publisher: Institute for Nuclear Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
  Languages: Ukrainian, English
  Periodicity: 4 times per year

  Open access peer reviewed journal


 Home page   About 
Nucl. Phys. At. Energy 2023, volume 24, issue 4, pages 360-375.
Section: Radiobiology and Radioecology.
Received: 17.06.2023; Accepted: 22.11.2023; Published online: 28.12.2023.
PDF Full text (ua)
https://doi.org/10.15407/jnpae2023.04.360

Radioisotopes of cesium and experience of cytogenetic dosimetry in emergency situations

V. A. Kurochkina*

Institute for Nuclear Research, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

*Corresponding author. E-mail address: knitel@ukr.net

Abstract: An analysis of data from the literature and own experimental studies related to radiation accidents with 137Cs, the ways of its entry and behavior in the human body, cytogenetic indicators for exposure dosimetry, experience in assessing the dose of victims under conditions of external exposure, and the problem of cytogenetic dosimetry of internal exposure are presented.

Keywords: cesium radioisotopes, 137Cs, radiation accidents, external exposure, internal exposure, cytogenetic dosimetry.

References:

1. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. UNSCEAR 2000. Report to the General Assembly. Vol. 1 (New York, UN, 2000) 654 p. https://www.unscear.org/docs/publications/2000/UNSCEAR_2000_Report_Vol.I.pdf

2. Toxicological profile for cesium. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. (U.S., Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, 2004) 306 p. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp157.pdf

3. Summary Report on the Post-Accident Review Meeting on the Chernobyl Accident. Report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group. Safety Series No. 75-INSAG-1 (Vienna, IAEA, 1986) 106 p. https://www.ilankelman.org/miscellany/chernobyl.pdf

4. Chernobyl’s Legacy: Health, Environmental and Socio-Economic Impacts and Recommendations to the Governments of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. The Chernobyl Forum: 2003 - 2005. Second revised version (Vienna, IAEA, 2006) 55 p. https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/chernobyl.pdf

5. Environmental Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident and their Remediation: Twenty Years of Experience. Report of the Chernobyl Forum Expert Group 'Environment' (Vienna, IAEA, 2006) 180 p. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1239_web.pdf

6. Y.A. Izrael (Ed.) Chernobyl: Radioactive Contamination of the Environment (Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1990) 296 p. (Rus)

7. The Fukushima Daiichi Accident. Technical volume 1/5. Description and Context of the Accident (Vienna, IAEA, 2015) 238 p. https://www.iaea.org/publications/10962/the-fukushima-daiichi-accident

8. G. Nordberg, B. Fowler, M. Nordberg (Eds.). Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals. 4th ed. (Elsevier/Academic Press, 2014) 1542 p. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265286034_Nordberg_GFFowler_BA_and_Nordberg_M_eds_Handbook_on_the_Toxicology_of_Metals_4th_edElsevierAcademic_Press_2014

9. W. Penney et al. Report on the accident at Windscale No. 1 Pile on 10 October 1957. J. Radiol. Prot. 37(3) (2017) 780. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aa7788

10. S. Jones. Windscale and Kyshtym: a double anniversary. J. Environ. Radioactiv. 99(1) (2008) 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2007.10.002

11. The Radiobiological Accident in Goiânia (Vienna, IAEA, 1988). https://www.iaea.org/publications/3684/the-radiological-accident-in-goiania

12. A. Wojcik et al. Cytogenetic damage in lymphocytes for the purpose of dose reconstruction: a review of three recent radiation accidents. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 104(1-4) (2004) 200. https://doi.org/10.1159/000077489

13. L.A. Ilyin et al. Early medical consequences of radiation incidents on the territory of the former Ukrainian SSR. Meditsina Truda i Promyshlennaya Ekologiya 10 (2012) 10. (Rus)

14. A. Ghosh, A. Sharma, G. Talukder. Clastogenic effects of caesium chloride on human peripheral blood lymphocytes in vitro. Toxicol. in Vitro 7(2) (1993) 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-2333(93)90123-M

15. R. Santos-Mello, T. Schmidt, E. Neuhauss. Induction of micronuclei by CsCl in vivo and in vitro. Mutat. Res. 446(2) (1999) 239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5718(99)00195-3

16. S. Bangh et al. Prolonged QT and polymorphic VT with chronic cesium use. J. Toxicol. - Clin. Toxic. 39(5) (2001) 556.

17. N.S. Harik, C.D. Stowe, P.M. Seib. Cesium induced prolonged QT syndrome. J. Invest. Med. 50(1) (2002) 141A.

18. R. Santos-Mello, LI. Deimling, A. Almeida. Induction of micronuclei in mouse polychromatic erythrocytes by the administration of non-radioactive CsCl by the oral and intraperitoneal route. Mutat. Res. 497(1-2) (2001) 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5718(01)00252-2

19. P. Olivier, D. Marzin. Study of the genotoxic potential of 48 inorganic derivatives with the SOS chromotest. Mutat. Res. 189 (1987) 263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(87)90057-7

20. http://www.lnhb.fr/nuclides/Cs-137_tables.pdf

21. http://www.lnhb.fr/nuclides/Cs-134_tables.pdf

22. V.F. Kozlov. Handbook of Radiation Safety (Moskva: Energoatomizdat, 1991) 352 p. (Rus)

23. Age-Dependent Doses to Members of the Public from Intake of Radionuclides. Part 1. ICRP Publication 56. Ann. ICRP 20(2) (1989). https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%2056

24. Age-Dependent Doses to Members of the Public from Intake of Radionuclides. Part 2. Ingestion Dose Coefficients. ICRP Publication 67. Ann. ICRP 23(3/4) (1993). https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%2067

25. L.A. Beaugé, R.A. Sjodin. Transport of caesium in frog muscle. J. Physiol. 194(1) (1968) 105. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008397

26. Y.I. Bandazhevsky. Chronic Cs-137 incorporation in children's organs. Swiss. Med. Wkly. 133(35-36) (2003) 488. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2003.10226

27. R.W. Leggett et al. A physiologically based biokinetic model for cesium in the human body. Sci. Total Environ. 317(1-3) (2003) 235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00333-4

28. Le Césium: De l'environnement à l'Homme. D. Robeau, F. Daburon, H. Métivier (Eds.) (EDP Sciences, 2000). 296 p. https://www.decitre.fr/ebooks/le-cesium-9782759801268_9782759801268_1.html

29. D.R. Melo et al. A biokinetic model for 137Cs. Health Phys. 73(2) (1997) 320. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199708000-00004

30. Limits for Intakes of Radionuclides by Workers. ICRP Publication 30 (Part 1). Ann. ICRP 2(3-4) (1979) 133 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-6453(79)90096-4

31. W. Müller, U. Scheffer. The metabolism and toxicity of caesium. In: Radionuclide Metabolism and Toxicity. P. Galle, R. Masse (Eds.) (Paris, Masson, 1982) p. 82.

32. The Radiological Accident in Tammiku (Vienna, IAEA, 1998) 70 p. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1053_web.pdf

33. The Radiological Accident in Lilo (Vienna, IAEA, 2000) 120 p. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1097_web.pdf

34. J.L. Lipsztein et al. Application of in vitro bioassay for 137Cs during the emergency phase of the Goiânia accident. Health Phys. 60(l) (1991) 43. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199101000-00006

35. J.L. Lipsztein et al. Studies of Cs retention in the human body related to body parameters and Prussian Blue administration. Health Phys. 60(1) (1991) 57. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199101000-00008

36. R. Leggett. Biokinetic models for radiocaesium and its progeny. J. Radiol. Prot. 33(1) (2013) 123. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/33/1/123

37. G. Schwartz, D.E. Dunning, Jr. Imprecision in estimates of dose from ingested 137Cs due to variability in human biological characteristics. Health Phys. 43(5) (1982) 631. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-198211000-00001

38. J. Rundo, F.M. Turner. On the biological half-life of caesium in pregnant women and in infants. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 41 (1992) 211. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a081257

39. A. Giussani et al. Eurados review of retrospective dosimetry techniques for internal exposures to ionising radiation and their applications. Radiat. Environ. Bioph. (59) (2020) 357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-020-00845-y

40. N.A. Doggett, W.H. McKenzie. An analysis of the distribution and dose response of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes after in vitro exposure to 137Cesium gamma radiation. Radiat. Environ. Bioph. 22(1) (1983) 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323759

41. L. Padovani et al. Cytogenetic study in lymphocytes from children exposed to ionizing radiation after the Chernobyl accident. Mutat. Res. 319(1) (1993) 55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(93)90030-H

42. S.M. Miller et al. Canadian Cytogenetic Emergency Network (CEN) for biological dosimetry following radiological/nuclear accidents. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 83(7) (2007) 471. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553000701370860

43. V. Hadjidekova et al. The use of the dicentric assay for biological dosimetry for radiation accident in Bulgaria. Health Phys. 98(2) (2010) 252. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e3181ab3ccf

44. A.N. Balasem, A.S.K. Ali, J.J. Abdul-Khaliq. The Yield of Micronuclei in Human Blood Lymphocytes Treated with Radioactive Caesium. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 46(4) (1993) 295. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a081690

45. A.N. Balasem, A.S.K. Ali. Establishment of dose-response relationships between doses of Cs-137 γ-rays and frequencies of micronuclei in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Mutat. Res. 259 (1991) 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(91)90047-P

46. K. Lijima K. Morimoto. Quantitative analyses of the induction of chromosome aberrations and sister-chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes exposed to gamma-rays and mitomycin-C in combination. Mutat. Res. 263(4) (1991) 263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7992(91)90011-R

47. K. Mikamo, Y. Kamiguchi, H. Tateno. Spontaneous and in vitro radiation-induced chromosome aberrations in human spermatozoa: application of a new method. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 340B (1990) 447.

48. K. Mikamo, Y. Kamiguchi, H. Tateno. The interspecific in vitro fertilization system to measure human sperm chromosomal damage. In: B.L. Gledhill, F. Mauro (Eds.) New Horizons in Biological Dosimetry (New York, Wiley-Liss, 1991) p. 531. Google books

49. Y. Kamiguchi, H. Tateno, K. Mikamo. Micronucleus test in 2-cell embryos as a simple assay system for human sperm chromosome aberrations. Mutat. Res. 252(3) (1991) 297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(91)90009-W

50. N.C. Arslan, C.R. Geard, E.J. Hall. Low dose-rate effects of cesium-137 and iodine-125 on cell survival, cell progression, and chromosomal alterations. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 9(6) (1986) 521. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-198612000-00011

51. M. Bauchinger. Chromosome painting and biological dosimetry of absorbed radiation. In: Radiation Research, 1895 - 1995: Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Radiation Research. Würzburg, Germany, August 27 - September 1, 1995 (Germany, ICRR Society, 1995). https://search.worldcat.org/title/radiation-research-1895-1995-proceedings-of-the-tenth-international-congress-of-radiation-research-wurzburg-germany-august-27-september-1-1995/oclc/37278026

52. M.A Silva, M. Lemes, O.R. Santos. Study of chromosome aberrations induced in human lymphocytes following irradiation with 60Co and 137Cs in vitro. In: 4th Meeting on Nuclear Applications, Encontro Nacional de Aplicacoes Nucleares, August 18 - 22, 1997, Pocos de Caldas, p. 129. http://repositorio.ipen.br/handle/123456789/12104

53. N.A. Maznyk, V.A. Vinnikov. Calibration dose-response relationships for cytogenetic biodosimetry of recent and past exposure to low dose gamma-radiation. Ukrayins'kyy Radiolohichnyy Zhurnal 12(4) (2004) 415. http://medradiologia.org.ua/assets/files/arch/2004/4/p415_425.pdf

54. Cytogenetic Dosimetry: Applications in Preparedness for and Response to Radiation Emergencies (Vienna, IAEA, 2011) 229 p. https://www.iaea.org/publications/8735/cytogenetic-dosimetry-applications-in-preparedness-for-and-response-to-radiation-emergencies

55. Radiation protection. Performance criteria for service laboratories performing biological dosimetry by cytogenetics. ISO 19238:2023(en). 36 p. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso:19238:ed-3:v1:en

56. Cytogenetic Analysis for Radiation Dose Assessment. Technical Reports Series No. 405 (Vienna. IAEA, 2001) 138 p. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/TRS405_scr.pdf

57. G. Obe, Vijayalaxmi (Eds.). Chromosomal Alterations. Methods, Results and Importance in Human Health. (Springer, 2007) 515 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71414-9

58. K.H. Harada et al. Radiation dose rates now and in the future for residents neighboring restricted areas of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(10) (2014) E914. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315684111

59. J. Depuydt et al. RENEB intercomparison exercises analyzing micronuclei (Cytokinesis-block Micronucleus Assay). Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 93 (2016) 36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2016.1206231

60. C. Beinke et al. Adaption of the Cytokinesis-Block Micronucleus Cytome Assay for Improved Triage Biodosimetry. Radiat. Res. 185(5) (2016) 461. https://doi.org/10.1667/RR14294.1

61. Radiological protection. Performance criteria for laboratories using the cytokinesis block micronucleus (CBMN) assay in peripheral blood lymphocytes for biological dosimetry. ISO 17099:2014. https://www.iso.org/ru/standard/59141.html

62. A.J. Sigurdson et al. International study of factors affecting human chromosome translocations. Mutat. Res. 652(2) (2008) 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.01.005

63. E.A. Ainsbury et al. What radiation dose does the FISH translocation assay measure in cases of incorporated radionuclides for the Southern Urals populations? Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 159(1-4) (2014) 26. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu118

64. E.A. Ainsbury et al. Uncertainty on radiation doses estimated by biological and retrospective physical methods. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 178(4) (2018) 382. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx125

65. E.J. Tawn, C.A. Whitehouse. Persistence of translocation frequencies in blood lymphocytes following radiotherapy: implications for retrospective radiation biodosimetry. J. Radiol. Prot. 23 (2003) 423. https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/23/4/005

66. C. Lindholm, A. Edwards. Long-term persistence of translocations in stable lymphocytes from victims of a radiological accident. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 80(8) (2004) 559. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553000412331283498

67. A.A. Edwards et al. Review of translocations detected by FISH for retrospective biological dosimetry applications. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 113(4) (2005) 396. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nch452

68. U. Yadav et al. Multifaceted applications of pre-mature chromosome condensation in radiation biodosimetry Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 96(10) (2020) 1274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2020.1798545

69. F. Darroudi et al. Detection of total- and partial-body irradiation in a monkey model: a comparative study of chromosomal aberration, micronucleus and premature chromosome condensation assays. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 74(2) (1998) 207. https://doi.org/10.1080/095530098141582

70. U. Yadav et al. Refined premature chromosome condensation (GO-PCC) with cryo-preserved mitotic cells for rapid radiation biodosimetry. Sci. Rep. 11(1) (2021) 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92886-6

71. C. Lindholm et al. Premature chromosome condensation (PCC) assay for dose assessment in mass casualty accidents. Radiat. Res. 173(1) (2010) 71. https://doi.org/10.1667/RR1843.1

72. B. Rungsimaphorn, B. Rerkamnuaychoke, W. Sudprasert. Establishment of dose-response curves for dicentrics and premature chromosome condensation for radiological emergency preparedness in Thailand. Genome Integr. 7(8) (2016) 1. https://doi.org/10.4103/2041-9414.197165

73. U. Oestreicher et al. RENEB intercomparisons applying the conventional Dicentric Chromosome Assay (DCA). Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 93(1) (2017) 20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2016.1233370

74. C.A. Oliveira et al. Design and operation of a whole-body monitoring system for the Goiânia radiation accident. Health Phys. 60(1) (1991) 51. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199101000-00007

75. C.E. Brandao-Mello et al. Clinical and hematological aspects of 137Cs: the Goiânia radiation accident. Health Phys. 60(1) (1991) 31. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199101000-00004

76. E.T. Sakamoto-Hojo, A.T. Natarajan, M.P. Curado. Chromosome translocations in lymphocytes from individuals exposed to 137Cs 7.5 years after the accident in Goiânia (Brazil). Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 86(1) (1999) 25. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032920

77. J.G. Hunt, C.A.N. Oliveira. A method for estimating 137Cs body burden under emergency conditions. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 30(4) (1990) 275. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a080628

78. A.T. Ramalho et al. Subsidies to Cytogenetic Dosimetry Technique Generated from Analysis of Results of Goiânia Radiological Accident. Thesis (Brazil, 1993) 136 p. (Portuguese) https://inis.iaea.org/Search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:43130633

79. A.T. Ramalho, A.C. Nascimento. The fate of chromosomal aberrations in 137Cs exposed individuals in the Goiânia radiation accident. Health Phys. 60(1) (1991) 67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199101000-00010

80. A.T. Ramalho, M.P. Curado, A.T. Natarajan. Lifespan of human lymphocytes estimated during a six year cytogenetic follow-up of individuals accidenttally exposed in the 1987 radiological accident in Brazil. Mutat. Res. 331(1) (1995) 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(95)00049-O

81. M. Sasaki, H. Miyata. Biological dosimetry in atomic bomb survivors. Nature 220 (1968) 1189. https://doi.org/10.1038/2201189a0

82. C. Lindholm et al. Biodosimetry after accidental radiation exposure by conventional chromosome analysis and FISH. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 70(6) (1996) 647. https://doi.org/10.1080/095530096144527

83. C. Lindholm et al. Persistence of translocations after accidental exposure to ionizing radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 74(5) (1998) 565. https://doi.org/10.1080/095530098141140

84. C. Lindholm et al. Intercomparison of translocation and dicentric frequencies between laboratories in a follow-up of the radiological accident in Estonia. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 78(10) (2002) 883. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553000210155888

85. J.N. Lucas et al. Rapid translocation frequency analysis in humans decades after exposure to ionizing radiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 62(1) (1992) 53. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553009214551821

86. J.N. Lucas et al. Stability of the translocation frequency following whole-body irradiation measured in rhesus monkeys. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 70(3) (1996) 309. https://doi.org/10.1080/095530096145049

87. G. Dolphin. Biological dosimetry with particular reference to chromosome aberrations analysis. A review of methods. In: Handling of Radiation Accidents. Proc. Int. Symp., Vienna, May 19 - 23, 1969. Proceedings Series (Vienna, IAEA, 1969) p. 215. Google books

88. A.T. Natarajan et al. Goiânia radiation accident: results of initial dose estimation and follow up studies. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 372 (1991) 145. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1956913/

89. L.K. Bezdrobna et al. Using the cytogenetic dosimetry for the control of potential over exposure of contractors enterprises staff of SSE ChNPP. Yaderna Fizyka ta Energetyka (Nucl. Phys. At. Energy) 17(2) (2016) 166. (Rus) https://doi.org/10.15407/jnpae2016.02.166

90. M.A. Pilinskaya. The results of selective cytogenetic monitoring of Chernobyl accident victims in the Ukraine. Health Phys. 71(1) (1996) 29. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199607000-00004

91. N. Màznyk, V. Vinnikov. Time-effect relationship for unstable chromosome exchange levels in Chernobyl clean-up workers. Tsitologiya i Genetika 38(4) (2004) 14. (Rus)

92. S. Alexanin et al. Chromosomal aberrations and sickness rates in Chernobyl clean-up workers in the years following the accident. Health Phys. 98(2) 2010 258. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e3181b66e42

93. F. Granath et al. Retrospective dose estimates in Estonian Chernobyl clean-up workers by means of FISH. Mutat. Res. 369(1-2) (1996) 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1218(96)90042-7

94. A.V. Sevan'kaev et al. Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes of residents of areas contaminated by radioactive discharges from the Chernobyl accident. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 58(4) (1995) 247. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082621

95. N.O. Màznyk. Cytogenetic effects as a biological indicator of the action of ionizing radiation in low doses in the early and long term after exposure in the Chernobyl contingent. Thesis Abstract for the degree of Doctor of Sciences in Biology (Kyiv, Scientific Center of Radiation Medicine, Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, 2005) 46 p. (Ukr)

96. J.N. Lucas et al. Rapid human chromosome aberration analysis using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 56(1) (1989) 35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553008914551161

97. I.E. Vorobtsova et al. Dependence of the frequency of stable and unstable chromosome aberrations on the irradiation dose of human lymphocytes in vitro. Radiation Biology. Radioecology 37(2) (1997) 233. (Rus)

98. E.A. Dyomina et al. Biological effectiveness of 137Cs gamma quanta at the chromosomal level of human peripheral lymphocytes. Dopovidi Akademiyi Nauk Ukrayiny (Reports of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine) 2 (1992) 150. (Ukr)

99. E.A. Demina. Biological effectiveness of 137Cs gamma radiation on the outcome of chromosomal aberrations in human peripheral blood lymphocyte culture. Ukrayins'kyy Radiolohichnyy Zhurnal 2 (1993) 107. (Ukr)

100. Yu.B. Kudryashov, Yu.F. Perov, A.B. Rubin. Radiation Biophysics: Radio Frequency and Microwave Electromagnetic Radiation. Textbook (Moskva: Fizmatlit; 2008). 184 p. (Rus)

101. O.M. Mikheev, Yu.V. Shilina. Electromagnetic Radiation. In: Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine. I.M. Dzyuba, A.I. Zhukovskyi, M.H. Zheleznyak et al. (Eds.) Vol. 9 (Kyiv: Institute of Encyclopedic Research, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2009). (Ukr) https://esu.com.ua/article-17747

102. V.A. Kurochkina et al. “Dose - effect” calibration dependence by frequency of unstable chromosomic exchanges in human lymphocytes in acute gamma irradiation by 137Ñs in low doses for biological dosimetry. Yaderna Fizyka ta Energetyka (Nucl. Phys. At. Energy) 22(2) (2021) 167. (Ukr) https://doi.org/10.15407/jnpae2021.02.167

103. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: A compendium of current information related to frequently used substances. ICRP Publication 128. Ann. ICRP 44(2S) (2015) 325 p. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645314558019

104. Occupational intakes of radionuclides: Part 1. ICRP Publication 130. Ann. ICRP 44(2) (2015) 192 p. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645315577539

105. The ICRP computational framework for internal dose assessment for reference adults: Specific absorbed fractions. ICRP Publication 133. Ann. ICRP 45(2) (2016) 77 p. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645316661077

106. Occupational intakes of radionuclides: Part 3. ICRP Publication 137. Ann. ICRP 46(3/4) (2017) 491 p. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/ANIB_46_3-4

107. D.R. Melo et al. 137Cs internal contamination involving a Brazilian accident, and the efficacy of Prussian Blue treatment. Health Phys. 66(3) (1994) 245. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199403000-00002

108. A.T. Ramalho, A.C.H. Nascimento, A.T. Natarajan. Dose assessments by cytogenetic analysis in the Goiânia (Brazil) radiation accident. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 25(2) (1988) 97. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a080358

109. One Decade After Chernobyl. Summing up the Consequences of the Accident. Proc. of an Int. Conf., Vienna, 8 - 12 April 1996 (Vienna, IAEA, 1996) 571 p. https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1001_web.pdf

110. V. Berkovski, G. Ratia, O. Nasvit. Internal doses to Ukrainian population using Dnieper river water. Health Phys. 71 (1996) 37. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199607000-00006

111. S.L. Simon et al. A summary of evidence on radiation exposures received near to the Semipalatinsk nuclear weapons test site in Kazakhstan. Health Phys. 84(6) (2003) 718. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-200306000-00004

112. Å. Shishkina et al. Reduction of measurement error of 90Sr, 137Cs and 40K content in human body using the SICH91M whole body counter. Instrumenty i Metody Izmereniya Radiatsii 90 (2017) 25. (Rus)

113. S. Roch-Lefèvre et al. A mouse model of cytogenetic analysis to evaluate caesium 137 radiation dose exposure and contamination level in lymphocytes. Radiat. Environ. Bioph. 55 (2016) 61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-015-0620-7

114. M.P. Little, B.E. Lambert. Systematic review of experimental studies on the relative biological effectiveness of tritium. Radiat. Environ. Bioph. 47 (2008) 71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-007-0143-y

115. S. Roch-Lefèvre et al. Cytogenetic damage analysis in mice chronically exposed to low-dose internal tritium beta-particle radiation. Oncotarget 9 (2018) 27397. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25282

116. G.P. Snegireva, T.I. Khaimovich, V.I. Nagiba. Estimation of the relative biological effectiveness of tritium based on the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes. Radiation Biology. Radioecology 50(6) (2010) 664. (Rus)

117. N. Vulpis. The induction of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes by in vitro irradiation with beta-particles from tritiated water. Radiat. Res. 97(3) (1984) 511. https://doi.org/10.2307/3576141

118. N. Vulpis, G. Scarpa. Induction of chromosome aberrations by 90Sr β-particles in cultured human lymphocytes. Mutat. Res. 63 (1986) 277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(86)90026-6

119. E.J. Broome, D.L. Brown, R.E.J. Mitchel. Dose responses for adaption to low doses of 60Co gamma rays and 3H beta particles in normal human fibroblasts. Radiat Res. 158(2) (2002) 181. https://doi.org/10.1667/0033-7587(2002)158[0181:DRFATL]2.0.CO;2

120. W. Deng et al. Biological dosimetry of beta-ray exposure from tritium using chromosome translocations in human lymphocytes analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Radiat. Res. 150(4) (1998) 400. https://doi.org/10.2307/3579658

121. G. Ribas et al. Genotoxicity of tritiated water in human lymphocytes. Toxicol. Lett. 70(1) (1994) 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4274(94)90145-7

122. J.S. Prosser et al. The induction of chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes by exposure to tritiated water in vitro. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 4(1) (1983) 21. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a081989

123. G. Joksić, V. Spasojević-Tisma. Chromosome analysis of lymphocytes from radiation workers in tritium-applying industry. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 71(3) (1998) 213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004200050272

124. E.M. de Oliveira et al. Evaluation of the effect of 90Sr beta-radiation on human blood cells by chromosome aberration and single cell gel electrophoresis (comet assay) analysis. Mutat. Res. 476(1-2) (2001) 109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0027-5107(01)00100-2

125. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE), quality factor (Q), and radiation weighting factor (WR). ICRP Publication 92. Ann. ICRP 33(4) (2003) 121 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6453(03)00024-1

126. L.K. Bezdrobna et al. Simulation of conditions for external and internal exposure of human blood to low doses of 137Cs radionuclide in vitro to study its genotoxicity. Yaderna Fizyka ta Energetyka (Nucl. Phys. At. Energy) 21(2) (2020) 166. https://doi.org/10.15407/jnpae2020.02.166

127. T. Sato, K. Manabe, N. Hamada. Microdosimetric analysis confirms similar biological effectiveness of external exposure to gamma-rays and internal exposure to 137Cs, 134Cs, and 131I. Plos One 9(6) (2014) e99831. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099831

128. V.A. Kurochkina et al. Chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes due to external and/or internal irradiation of blood samples by 137Cs in model experiments in vitro. Yaderna Fizyka ta Energetyka (Nucl. Phys. At. Energy) 22(3) (2021) 300. (Ukr) https://doi.org/10.15407/jnpae2021.03.300